Some conspiracy theorists are calling this a plandemic and that the WHO created it. Whether or not you believe this, one thing that’s beyond dispute is that the WHO created the mechanism for calling it a pandemic and requiring vaccines.
The World Health Organization — the WHO — is the UN’s health and vaccine arm which is funded mainly by the world’s largest governments and pharmaceutical companies.
I’m sure the WHO does many good things in many different countries. Probably its most important function, though, is to set standards and create definitions of the language so that it means that same thing in each country and for each disease, outbreak, or medicine.
Languages, as you know, tend to change over time. So it’s no surprise that dictionaries have to be updated every few years just to keep up.
However, no dictionary is fast enough for the WHO, which has been changing definitions faster than Australia was changing Prime Ministers.
Two key terms being thrown around right now are, “pandemic” and “herd immunity.”
Before 2009, an influenza Pandemic was defined on the WHO website as:
Pre-2009 definition
An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.
Source: WHO
However, on 4 May 2009 it suddenly changed to
4 May 2009 definition
An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity.
Source: WHO
A month later, the WHO declared the swine flu a “Pandemic.”
Why? Because it went from not meeting the definition to all of a sudden not needing the enormous numbers of dead bodies.
Of course, proving the human population has no immunity is rather difficult given that the human body has an immune system that develops an immune response called antibodies. The fact that these aren’t detectable or even present in the human body doesn’t mean we’re going to die, but it does prove that we haven’t had the virus recently and therefore don’t necessarily have immunity.
What happened in 2009 was that a few kids and Indians died of H1N1, but adults seemed to be immune to it. Maybe it had been around 20 years earlier as a common cold? This was a major problem for a pandemic, because if enough people gain immunity, then the virus simply stops spreading, commonly known as herd immunity. This is a problem from a marketing standpoint, because you can’t sell vaccines to a population headed for herd immunity.
But, the WHO is nothing if not a problem solving organization. The problem of overcoming natural herd immunity can be solved by removing it from the definition. It took a few tries, but they got there in the end.
Here’s the original definition:
23 October definition
Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. This means that even people who haven’t been infected, or in whom an infection hasn’t triggered an immune response, they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person. The threshold for establishing herd immunity for COVID-19 is not yet clear.
sOURCE: who 23 oCTOBER 2020
The problem, as I pointed out, is that this includes natural immunity and is completely neutral with regards to vaccines. The WHO fixed this by completely removing any reference to natural immunity.
It was also way too simple. Normal people could understand it. So the WHO went from a one paragraph definition to 8 paragraphs. I’ve deleted most of the drivel in the extract below.
24 November definition
‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.
Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.
Vaccines train our immune systems to develop antibodies, just as might happen when we are exposed to a disease but – crucially – vaccines work without making us sick.
‘Herd immunity’ exists when a high percentage of the population is vaccinated, making it difficult for infectious diseases to spread, because there are not many people who can be infected. Read our Q&A on vaccines and immunization for more information.
Achieving herd immunity with safe and effective vaccines makes diseases rarer and saves lives.
sOURCE: who 24 nOV 2020
Clearly the WHO went a bit far here, totally denying natural immunity, which we know exists for every other disease. Just not for COVID-19 apparently.
So WHO added it back and, in case you weren’t sure which way the WHO was leaning, they made it very clear that they support vaccination by saying precisely that, and then taking another giant step with the claim that this is how it should be done.
This is the WHO becoming the health/vaccine police.
Vaccines also work without making us sick, according to the WHO, which must come as a relief to the 12,313 dead and 12,808 permanently disabled reported in VAERS.
However, they also forgot to mention that vaccines stop us from passing on the pathogen, so that got added to the definition as well. Again, I’ve moved most of the drivel in the extract below:
Current definition
‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. WHO supports achieving ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination, not by allowing a disease to spread through any segment of the population, as this would result in unnecessary cases and deaths.
Herd immunity against COVID-19 should be achieved by protecting people through vaccination, not by exposing them to the pathogen that causes the disease.
Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but – crucially – vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing on the pathogen, breaking any chains of transmission. Visit our webpage on COVID-19 and vaccines for more detail.
Achieving herd immunity with safe and effective vaccines makes diseases rarer and saves lives.
sOURCE: who
As an aside, people without symptoms weren’t previously considered infectious, however those who have been vaccinated and contract Covid have been found to be highly infectious. So this definition may change again, just as the CDC again changed its mask recommendations.
So now we have a pandemic that’s highly infectious, and can only be fixed with vaccines, despite the fact that vaccines don’t actually stop the virus and weren’t designed to stop the virus.
The only thing that would have been missing were the dead bodies. But the WHO recognized its earlier mistake: it didn’t direct that anyone dying within a month of testing positive for H1N1 be recorded as an H1N1 death. Very poor oversight. On average, around 2% of people over 80 will die in the next month, so it’s an easy way to get the numbers up and create dead bodies. The WHO fixed this last year.
And that’s how you create a pandemic and a massive vaccine rollout. The pen is indeed mightier than the sword.
A deadly virus that’s very, very, very dangerous. Like, really dangerous.
Effective vaccines that work and don’t kill you.
One Comment on “How the World Health Organization moves the pandemic and vaccine goal posts”
Comments are closed.